Very nice, Paul. I remember you posted a few shots from this occation a while back, right? ;-)
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 13. marts 2005 16:05 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: K 45-125mm f/4 and K 200mm f/4 on *ist D or *ist DS I've used the M200/4 extensively. I always thought it was an incredible bargain, since it's not very expensive and it performs very well. I used it for a lot of my wakeboarding pics. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2686457 On Mar 13, 2005, at 9:57 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Nice photos. > > I have the A200/4, seems yet an other optical formula as well. I > haven't done too much shooting with it yet, but it does seem an > excellent performer on the DS. > > Godfrey > > On Mar 13, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Jens Bladt wrote: > >> Well I have tried a M 4/200mm on *ist D. Brilliant lens. >> This one was done with the SMC Pentax-M 4/200mm and *ist D: >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/6008407/ >> >> The K and M are not identical. The K has a 5-5 configuration and 58mm >> front >> element, the M has a 6-5 configuration and a 52mm front element. So >> my guess >> is the K is optacally better (and quite rare due to only 2 years vs. >> 7 years >> of production), but I'm only guessing, here. >
