I had the 75 in Leica LTM mount but sold it to raise money for my second *istD. It was a very nice lens, but I don't think it was the equal of my K 85/1.8. Of course that's comparing apples to oranges, because results with my Leica IIIf are dependent on the accuracy of the rangefinder mechanism. Paul
> > Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 8:48:25 PM, Scott wrote: > SL> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:03:37 -0500, Jon Paul Schelter (R* Toronto) > SL> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Has anyone here used any of the Voigtlander lenses that CameraQuest > >> lists here? > >> > SL> Nope, but man, you've got my attention. They're offering a 90 and a > SL> 75. Woohoo! Keep us posted if you find out anything. > > I think either Mark or Rob here use the 125/2.5 SL Macro. Tested it to > be better than 135/1.8*A wide open, and better than the Pentax macro, > IIRC. You can find it in the archives. So I would have high hopes for > the other lenses. The 75 and 90 are IIRC exact clones of their lenses > in rangefinder mounts (so you can I assume read just the reviews of the > Leica versions), while the 40 is a SLR design. > > Good light! > fra >
