Damn now you made me look it up.

For the baseball predictor it has nothing to do with City.

From 1952 to 1976 if the American League (AL) won the world series the Republicans would win the presidency. If the National League (NL) won the series the Democrats won the Presidency. (100%). Since 1976 it's been split evenly). But since 1920 this predictor has been right about 71 1/2 % of the time. If I could predict anything that well I'd be rich. The Red Sox are an AL team by the way.

I was wrong about the Superbowl it was actually a single team, the Washington Redskins, from 1940 to 2000 if the Redskins won their last home game the incumbent party kept the White House, if they lost the incumbent party lost. This was 100%. Prior to the 1940 the Redskins weren't in Washington and they weren't the Redskins. In 2004 the Redskins lost the crucial game. (Oh well another swell theory down the drain).



Mishka wrote:

i believe both were boston (red sox and patriots -- man, i have been
living in this country
far too long! ), no clash

best,
mishka


On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:42:11 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Superbowl and World Series were pretty good predictors of the US
Presidency, this year they clashed, I
can't remember which won.

Doug Franklin wrote:



Hi Jostein,

On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:31:59 +0100, Jostein wrote:





Hm...
In sync with the years of minimum solar activity in the sunspot
cycles...:-)

How's that for economic theory?




Well, it's really more of a hypothesized predictor.  As one, it's no
worse than the "which conference won the Super Bowl" predictor, which
IIRC was remarkably accurate for about 30 years, and may still be, for
all I know.  Or maybe the Super Bowl one was for US Presidential
elections rather than the economy.

TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ







--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
       --P.J. O'Rourke










--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to