Scott Loveless wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:53:11 +0000, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good shot mate. Get her number ? ;-)No. Sorry. :S
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:59:27 -0800 (PST), Rick Womer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really like it. The wall to her right and the table
to her left provide converging lines, and even a sense
of motion that contrasts with the static person.
Thanks, Rick! I never really looked at it quite like that, but I think you're right. It's almost as if I'm being drawn into the focal point.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:02:49 +0000, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
She's counting.
"Yup. Still two of 'em".
<VBG>
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:33:36 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope you got her to sign a model release...
Nope. But I doubt it matters. It's not like we can see her face.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:10:24 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neat. I hope she didn't pitch something at you... ;-)Actually, she didn't. She made some "flirtatious" remark about not
taking her photo and then posed for me when I raised the camera back
to my eye. I must have been in one of my very rare charismatic
moments, because women typically don't flirt with me. I don't care
much for the posed shot.
Is that some reference to your name, mayhaps you should change it...
Thanks for the feedback! Keep it coming. BTW, a photo.netter recommended cropping the top. Any thoughts?
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke
