Hello frank, It certainly is sharp enough for display, IMO. The front wheel seems overly large in perspective. It is harder for me to see the 'Tude in this one as opposed to the first one. Tough call which I like better. The attitude was more visible in the first, but the rest of the scene in this second are better - not so cluttered, etc. Perhaps both would stand together better as part of a theme as opposed to a single shot.
-- Best regards, Bruce Friday, March 4, 2005, 4:23:00 PM, you wrote: ft> A couple of days ago, I posted one of Kiki, in a rather reflective ft> mood. I took several others of her that day; I actually prefered ft> this one to the first, except I thought the neg looked a bit soft ft> (yes, I do have standards <g>). After some of the comments I got ft> earlier in the week, I decided to get this one printed up, and I was ft> pleasantly surprised, as It's certainly sharp enough for me: ft> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3169638 ft> BTW, as a follow up on my comments WRT track bikes, she's doing a ft> hands free track stand (something I can't do, but I think I'll have to ft> work on it). Track stands on a fix are simple, doing it with no hands ft> isn't (yet). ft> As part of the festivities before, between and after courier races, ft> there's a hands-free track-stand competition, where the courier must ft> remove her bag (lifting the strap over her head), take off a jersey ft> and put it in her courier bag, replacing the bag over the shoulder, ft> all without falling or putting a foot down. Only a few succeed, but I ft> can't recall the fastest time. ft> Enough courier chat (I'm sure you're all bored by it anyway). FYI, ft> for anyone who missed it, or to refresh your memories, here's the shot ft> of Kirsten (her real name) that I posted earlier: ft> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3164457 ft> As always, comments are most appreciated. Thanks in advance. ft> cheers, ft> frank
