Bob W wrote:
Hi,
They are good, competent photos, better than average, but really nothing special. It's standard English Tourist Board fare.
I was thinking as I looked at the thumbnails that it must be nice to live near stuff that is that photogenic.
They are nice places, but the photographs are hackneyed.
Of course they are! Would you spend the time and money to go to a famous place, such as the Eiffel Tower or to Big Ben and NOT take a photograph?
How can a photographer NOT take photos of them, just as everyone else has done?
Or did you mean it in a different way?
keith whaley
