Very informative, Fred! Bravo!
Jens

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. februar 2005 19:47
Til: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Emne: Re: Opinions about Tokinas (Was Sigmas)


> That lens has done an *excellent* job of capturing the breast
> feathers' structure. I used to keep birds (parrots mostly) and
> that's what their breast feathers look like when seen close up.
> Robins are much the same.

Well, I'm not so sure...

http://trc.ucdavis.edu/mjguinan/apc100/modules/Integument/hair/feathers2/fea
thers5.html

http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?cls=15&cat=1829&articleid=2776

http://www.ummz.lsa.umich.edu/birds/Anatomy/feathers/feather_parts.html

I think that the photo is showing the barbs but not the barbules, and (as
mark has suggested) has sort of "sharpened" the barbs to provide a high
~apparent~ detail without actually showing the detail.

Fred



Reply via email to