On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:29:47 -0800, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The tree is over 267 feet tall, 40 feet across its base and over 107 > feet around. Estimates of its age range from 1500 to 2000 years old. > > For those who wanted to get a sense of scale, here are two shots with > my kids at the base of the tree: > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1268.htm
So, I'm waiting for this one to load, which it's doing from top to bottom, and I'm thinking, yup, big trees, very tall trees, trees taller than I've ever seen trees... And then all of a sudden the tiny people appear at the bottom, and I realize just how humungous these suckers are! Man, those are BIG TREES!! <g> > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1269.htm You guys actually have snowsuits in CA, eh? <g> > > These are by no means artistic, just a recording of the family. Is that Erin in blue? It looks like her (from pix I've seen before). Who are the others? Lovely looking fam! cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
