On 20 Feb 2005 at 20:02, Herb Chong wrote: > that CF cards are more failure prone isn't the issue. the issue is that > every CF card, regardless of size, has the most danger of failure during > insertion, and the more you have to insert into anything, the more likely > something will go wrong. last i heard, it wasn't possible to change the card > type in a *istD, so that means the fewer insertions, the better, given that > direct cable connection is both much slower and has a connector that is at > least > as failure prone.
If some clever sod could better design the adaptors below to reduce SD card protrusion we'd be able to have the best of both worlds. http://www.mittoni.com.au/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/1183 Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
