Shel, Tech details MAY be important so as not to distract from the sense of the image..whatever one imagines that to be. Photogs view images through a tech veil of experience wherein a clear statement will allow some a chance at interpretation without mood disrupting 'imperfections'. Inexperienced or non photogs, however, may not 'see' tech aspects at all, but observed tech successes warrant comment.
Jack --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi > Sun, 20 Feb 2005 02:41:22 -0800 > > LOL ... You keep very careful records on your > photos, eh? ;-) > > I like the many interacting elements in this, all > working within > a geometric framework. The sense of being "inside" > vs "outside", > the commanding word and strong graphic images framed > in the > fence all work together brilliantly. > > ========================================== > > Never saw this in my in box, just when cruising the > archives. > > I appreciate your comments, Godfrey, and it's nice > to know that you were > able to see into the photo a bit. > > I just hate keeping written records. For photos I > can usually be close > enough for my needs just by looking at the > photograph and the negative. > For me, it's really not important that everything be > precise. Usually I > don't mention such details, but recently someone > asked for them. Anyway, > for the most part, tech details don't mean squat > when viewing pics on the > web or at small sizes. > > Shel > > > > > http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/obey.html > > > > Junk? Profound? Intriguing? Bland? <LOL> > > > > I don't know .... just a quick little snap of a > scene that > > caught my attention. > > > > Technical details: Leica or Pentax, 50mm or 85mm > lens, Tri-X > > probably .... > > > Shel > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
