On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:49:03 +0100, Peter Lacus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Frank,
> 
> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3125114&size=lg
> 
> my first thought was: great shoot(!) but perhaps little bit imbalanced
> to the right side(?). Of course I know it's not so easy to aim the
> camera straight at someone unknown in the proximity but it makes me
> wonder if it was your intention?
> 
> Nevertheless, the more I'm looking at your picture the merrier it looks
> to me. Very expressive shot.
> 
> I hope you'll understand me right, because my English is becoming
> horrible when I'd like to say something non-trivial. :-(
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bedo.
> 

Hi,

First, thanks so much for your comment!  I really appreciate you (and
everyone else) taking the time to look at and comment on the photo.

To answer your question, I framed the shot as I did, because there
were other people in the next seat, immediately to the right (his
left) of the little boy, and I really didn't want them in the frame -
the only two humans I wanted were the man and his boy.  Since I'm not
one who every thinks, "I'll crop it out later", I decided to "crop in
the viewfinder" (ie:  frame) that way.  And, I was actually thinking
at the time that I'd like to wait for the subway to enter into a
station,  so that we'd see the bright station whizzing by in the
windows of the door, rather than the blackness of the tunnel.

So, my framing had nothing to do with whether I thought the subjects
would see me taking their photo (although in this case, I didn't want
them to, as I didn't want the intimate moment to be disturbed). 
Normally, I don't have a problem with strangers knowing I'm taking
their photos (as many of my past PAWs will attest to).

In case you didn't see the other thread, here's the uncropped version:

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3127790&size=lg

which I now like a great deal more.  I think showing more door,
although it puts the subjects even more to the right of the frame,
opens up the shot, and balances them a bit better on the right.

Anyway, thanks so much for your comments!  BTW, don't apologize for
your English, you seem very articulate.  <g>

cheers,
frank


-- 
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to