So you're voting for number 2. It's more hopeful than 1.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
This could mean one of two things, 1.) They don't have an upgraded
replacement to compete with the
new Canon D-Rebel XT and they've decided to compete on price alone, or
2.) they have a replacement coming
and they want to blow out the old stock and make room before they have
to sell them for even less.
How about "It was priced high for early adopters and now went to a more competitive (even lossy) price"?
I seem to recall that the -D price dropped before stopping production.
Kostas
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke
