Nothing new there, though.

Look at the ME, for example.  Auto-exposure only.
(Or, if you consider that just an intermediate model
until the ME Super came along, how about the MG or MV?)

Stripped-down models with features removed are common.
SP500, K1000, Program Plus, A3000, the whole P series ...

About the only feature-reduced model I can think of (post
K1000) that *wasn't* designed to sell primarily into the
perceived mindless-point-and-shoot market was the MZ-M


Peter J. Alling mused:
> 
> As opposed to disabling features because people are too ignorant to 
> learn to use them correctly...
> 
> John Francis wrote:
> 
> >But you're still basing your agument on the (apparently unwarranted)
> >premise that the *ist-DS *does* disable TTL flash for all non-AF lenses.
> >According to other posters here, that simply isn't the case.
> >
> >As I said, people are far too fast to accuse Pentax of deliberately
> >disabling bodies for the sole purpose of selling new lenses.
> >
> >
> >Peter J. Alling mused:
> >  
> >
> >>John you're right and you're wrong.  If the lens tells the body the 
> >>focus distance, that would be usefully for
> >>helping calculate the flash duration, disabling TTL flash with lenses 
> >>that don't support sending distance
> >>information to the body has two purposes, and one is the sale of new 
> >>lenses, the other is the assumption
> >>that the user is incapable of a rational decision.  The better solution 
> >>would be to make the user aware of how
> >>the body calculates TTL flash exposure and allow the user to make a 
> >>choice, not force one on him.
> >>
> >>John Francis wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Jens Bladt mused:
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>Kostas wrote:
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>I believe it was
> >>>>>mentioned previously that on the -Ds it does not do TTL if you don't
> >>>>>have an AF lens. This is a limitation induced with extortion in mind,
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>Why are people so fast to make unfounded accusations like this?
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>Is this really true! What would AF have to do with flash duration?
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>Distance, distance, distance.
> >>>
> >>>The digital contact (introduced on the AF lenses) doesn't just tell
> >>>the camera body the lens identification code and current aperture
> >>>(and focal length, for zooms); it apparently also reports the focus
> >>>distance.  While there is no official confimation from Pentax, it is
> >>>believed that the metering logic makes some use of this information.
> >>>(Nikon, of course, made a big feature of their 3D Matrix Metering,
> >>>introduced at about the same time.  Pentax don't even mention it).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>-- 
> >>I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. 
> >>During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings 
> >>and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during 
> >>peacetime.
> >>    --P.J. O'Rourke
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. 
> During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings 
> and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during 
> peacetime.
>       --P.J. O'Rourke
> 
> 

Reply via email to