I agree about the focus. It's one of the things that spoil it for me. I only got 2 shots, she moved during the second and once she realised I was taking her picture she ran off :-)
In regards to the 77 ltd. it's fantastic. But I only have 2 other primes to compare with, the 31 and the FA 100 Macro f2.8. I think the images are noticeably sharp straight out of the camera, compared to my zooms (But that's to be expected). I've only used it on the *ist D. I still have a roll that needs processing, that I recently took with my LX. BTW to all the Aussie listers'. When I made my inquiries into getting the 77 in black I wasn't holding my breath. But I was told the supplier has started keeping a few in stock. So if you're thinking of getting one in black you may be surprised to find it available. Thanks for your comments Will. Dave S On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:16:17 -0600, Will Dimmit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nice picture - think it conveys the feeling of confused frustration > well. I think my one question would be, would it be more powerful with > the point of focus shifted to a more significant point in the picture, > like her eye or the corner of the glasses frame. An aside, how has the > 77mm Limited treated you on your *ist D? > > Peace, > will > > David S wrote: > > >G'day folks, > > > >Shot of my Mum while she was checking her email. > > > >http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_1.htm > > > >I'm a bit undecided about it. Would appreciate others' thoughts/comments. > > > >Be gentle, it's my first time <g> > > > >Dave S > > > > > > > >
