I do plan to get a 28mm eventually. The reason I want a telephoto first is there are some pictures that I would like to take from the side of the road. I would really hate to get arrested for trespassing. :-) BTW, I see that keh has some very nice prices, but that they say a lense in excellent condition may have some dust. Is this normal? Will it affect the picture quality any?
-----Original Message----- From: Jon M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 1:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: New K1000 owner Hi! Welcome to the madness that is this list. :) I bought a Sears 80-200/4 from a friend for $20, it's not been bad for such a cheap lens. Local shops seem to have the same lens around $40-$50. If you want something likely better, check out the SMC Pentax-A 70-210/4. If you'd rather have some primes, look into a 100mm or 135mm and 200mm. I bought from a list member a SMC Pentax-M 135/3.5 that I've lately considered selling, though it has a couple minor issues. It only focuses out to about 75-100 feet and the hood tends to not stay put. These are probably fixable... the hood is no big deal, and I only noticed the focus issue when taking pictures of boats out on the water. Pick up a 28mm or so wide angle if you come across one. I have a SMC Pentax-M 28/3.5 I've been very happy with. I've found wide angle lenses to be more fun than telephoto. -Jon Myers. --- Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all. I just got me a K1000 from a pawn shop > with the standard 50mm > lenses. It seems to work fine. My question though is > about lenses. I'm > looking for a decent zoom. I'm thinking 70-210 or > thereabouts. Any > suggestions? I'm looking to keep it under $100 if > possible. I can go higher > if needed. > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

