On 23 Dec 2004 at 22:00, Peter Smekal wrote:

> Understandable .. but what was the "function" then for all the 28's around?
> Wasn't there a time when 28-50-135 was a normal combo for at least advanced
> amateur? 

I sold my 28mm because I have 24mm lenses and a 31mm and I thought I wouldn't 
need it, but on occasion I need a 28mm AOV. So it's "function" for me is when 
the image I am trying to create demands the AOV afforded by a 28mm lens.


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to