Don't know, mine is officially the 'SMC Pentax-F 1:3.5-4.5 35-70mm'. They sell in EX condition for about $40.00, good deal IMHO.
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 6:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Comsumer Zooms > > > The guy from whom I bought my F70-210mm also had a wideangle > zoom, which he > bought with his SF1n. He said it was brilliant and didn't want to > sell this > one. (He was a photographer BTW - who said pros don't use Pentax??). Could > it have been the 35-70mm - without the "F"? > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 19. december 2004 01:13 > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: RE: Comsumer Zooms > > > Hi Joe, I'm the one that has the 35-70/3.5-4.5, I think > it's a great little lens. > It's the one that shot this: > http://www.donsauction.com/PDML/hinge.htm > > Don > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 6:06 PM > > To: pdml > > Subject: Re: Comsumer Zooms > > > > > > "OK, Don - I admit to being wrong. Here's what it says on the lens: > > SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 35-80mm." > > > > Ah, this one I have. It came with my ZX-50. You are right, it can give > > some quite decent results. This was taken with it: > > > > http://pug.komkon.org/00octo/Djenne_Market_Day.html > > > > My travel health nurse liked this so much that she borrowed the > > negative, and had a 20 x 30" enlargement made. At proper viewing > > distance, the print was quite decent. > > > > Joe > > > > >
