I'm not saying it's wrong. :-)
I think it's very likely that the Sri Lanka events had a siginficant
impact. There's archaeological remnants of settlements on Greenland at
least until 1350, but by then the socielty there were probably well
past it's prime.
Jostein
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Some really neat northern lights photos


> Well, I am will to believe that the information I read was wrong,
but I am just
> as willing to believe my memory is inaccurate (especially nowadays).
>
>
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> -----------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> Jostein wrote:
> > I don't think the Viking settlements on Greenland were abandoned
until
> > about 1400. It was since about 1350 that the climate grew
> > progressively colder in both Greenland and Northern Europe. This
trend
> > culminated with the "little ice-age" which ended between 1850 and
> > 1900.
> >
> > Recently, there has also been speculation that the downfall of the
> > Mayan civilisation was caused by the same events, leading to
drought
> > in the middle-americas.
> >
> > Jostein
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 11:21 PM
> > Subject: Re: Some really neat northern lights photos
> >
> >
> >
> >>The volcanic eruption in Sri Lanka caused global cooling that
caused
> >
> > Greenland
> >
> >>to become uninhabitable about 1100 or so. At least that is the
> >
> > current theory
> >
> >>(or the latest one I have seen, anyway)
> >>
> >>
> >>graywolf
> >>http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> >>"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> >>-----------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Jon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Dec 3, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>1) the weather was a lot warmer back then, almost like it is
> >
> > today, so
> >
> >>>>Greenland and Vinland really were a lot greener, on the coasts
> >
> > anyway.
> >
> >>>>then
> >>>>came the Little Ice Age.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>You know, I remember learning as a young lad, that Greenland,
when
> >
> > it
> >
> >>>was named, was first sighted at the one time of year when it is
> >
> > actually
> >
> >>>green (those few, rare days in the summer?) and that it was such
a
> >
> > sight
> >
> >>>to the poor-sea-faring eyes of the discoverers, and looked so
> >
> > pleasant,
> >
> >>>that they named it green land, because that was how it looked.
> >
> > However,
> >
> >>>only later did they discover the truth. Wasn't the settlement
> >
> > there
> >
> >>>eventually abandoned because it was so uninhabitable?
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to