Photographic lies are much older than photoshop. Some of us think that all photographs lie.

A citation from another mail today, in case you missed it:

See this link:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=90906

If you see the two smaller images below the large one you can click on the one to the right. It shows the setup I used when I made the picture. Nothing fancy...

DagT


P� 26. nov. 2004 kl. 17.19 skrev Peter J. Alling:

Alright then where can I buy one of those...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

fra: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

DagT wrote:


That's funny, because I thought the 4000 ppi scan on the Nikon made the up-rezed 1DS image look pretty sad in comparison. However, as somebody said--apples to oranges. Interesting to look at, but . . .

Like this:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2035313

DagT

PS: Sorry...  :-)



You should be.  (Nice Photoshop though).


Wrong, no photoshop. The image is unmanipulated :-)

DagT





--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke







Reply via email to