In that article Mike says: <quote> All-purpose 28-200mm zoom lenses: Bad snapshots. Also great for making five rolls of film last a whole year. All-purpose = no purpose <end quote>
Do you folks agree or disagree with this? I've been thinking this range would make a good event/party/gathering/group/portrait/head-shot/etc lens. Anyone tried one? What did you think? Don It was my Vivitar 28-210 that got me into this list. After using it exclusively on my ME super I happened to shoot a roll half with that and half with the "lowly" M 50/2.0. The M 50/2.0 was soooooooo much sharper that I decided to go back to shooting primes, and joined the list to find out which cheap primes were good. I ended up buying a K 28/3.5, M 135/3.5, and M 200/4.0. Then I found out about enablement and added a K 1000 with a 50 and a 100/ 4.0 macro, a K 35/3.5, a Z1-p, and a FA* 300/4.5. And you can't get rid of me now :) Butch
