Well, is not that bad. Don't drop it and it will work just fine. The MZ6 may have a slightly lower build quality than the MZ5n/3, but it's much, much better than those plastic toys - you-know-what-brand (or even the MZ-60 and *ist). But I hate that viewfinder...
Alex Sarbu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 2:53 PM Subject: RE: ZX/MZ-5n vs ZX-L/MZ-6 > > According to Boz's site the 6/L and the 5n both use SAFOX IV for AF, does > this mean they should perform about the same? > The 6/L does have the ability to use the 360 FGZ flash, I use this with the > *ist and the capabilities are awesome. > However I question the build quality of the 6/L given that used 5n's seem to > go for about the same money as new 6/L's. > Have any of you compared the sturdiness/reliability of the two? > The 5n's have been 100% reliable for me, even thru a few good jolts and a > couple of minor drops. > > Don > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Whittingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 6:38 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: ZX/MZ-5n vs ZX-L/MZ-6 > > > > > > Flash yes, AF? (never used one) > > > > John > > > > John Whittingham > > > > Technician > > > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:36:05 +0000 > > Subject: Re: ZX/MZ-5n vs ZX-L/MZ-6 > > > > > There is none. > > > First was the 5 then the 3 which added 1/4000, braketing and DOF. > > > Then the 5n was a 3 whith the the 5's shutter. > > > > > > Hope I didn't mess up but that's it. > > > > > > But the 6 has way better flash and AF doesn't it ? > > > > > > >----- Message Initial ----- > > > >De > > > : Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Envoy? > > > : Samedi > > > , Juillet > > > 10, 2004 11:31 AM > > > >A > > > : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Objet > > > : RE: ZX/MZ-5n vs ZX-L/MZ-6 > > > > > > > >I almost bought a 3 last month but the price went to $325.00 > > by auction > > end, > > > >and I couldn't see the 100 or so dollars higher than the 5n. > > > >Other than the faster top shutter speed and 125x speed have > > you noted any > > > >other differences between the 3 and the 5n? > > > > > > > >Don > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: John Whittingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 6:18 AM > > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> Subject: Re: ZX/MZ-5n vs ZX-L/MZ-6 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> MZ-3! > > > >> > > > >> John Whittingham > > > >> > > > >> Technician > > > >> > > > >> ---------- Original Message ----------- > > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> Sent: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:57:47 +0000 > > > >> Subject: ZX/MZ-5n vs ZX-L/MZ-6 > > > >> > > > >> > I just hesitate and dunno which to choose. > > > >> > What would you look after ? > > > >> > > > > >> > 5n has no advanced flash functions and 1/2000s shutter instead of > > > >> > 1/4000 but the 5n controls are so much more like "oldies" :) > > > >> > > > > >> > Any other idea ? What about the AF ? > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks > > > >> ------- End of Original Message ------- > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------- End of Original Message ------- > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Incearca acum noul sistem de dating oferit de portalul acasa.ro > > --------------------------------------------------------------- Incearca acum noul sistem de dating oferit de portalul acasa.ro
