rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The coal basket is very sharp on my monitor. There is no blurring of the lines and sky background. I think it would print very well on a good inkjet printer.
Paul
On Jul 9, 2004, at 6:22 PM, Jostein wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to answer one q.
The raw file was converted to a 16 bit tiff, using the C1 Pro converter. I
adjusted the whitebalance a little, cropped out a stone on the left and a
small cloud on top, and did my best to find the optimum amount of
sharpening, based on the coal basket.
In photoshop, I exported a jpg for the paw and a full-res. (Just noticed
that the full version was compressed a bit. I have added a max-quality jpeg
now.)
http://www.oksne.net/paw/worldsend.html
cheers, Jostein
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 11:45 PM Subject: Re: PAW: At World's end
Hi Jostein, Interesting corner of the world and a nice shot. I saw your question about softness on the photonet page. I'd love to see a blow up of just the coal basket. It should resolve quite well if you converted a RAW to a 16 bit 144 meg file or an 8 bit 72 meg file. Could the softness be in the Sigma glass? My softest lens is my Sigma EX 17-35. (Although I find it acceptable. It's just not up to Pentax SMC standards.) Paul On Jul 9, 2004, at 5:24 PM, Jostein wrote:
About time I shook the water off my paws again. Here's one for public scrutiny.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/worldsend.html
Any and all comments welcome.
Cheers, Jostein
