> First, I like what you've tried to do, 
juxtaposing the old 
relic with the
> new office building.  From there the photo goes rapidly downhill.  The
> tonality for B&W is terrible, the image is flat, not particularly sharp
> (and, in this case, that's a detriment), lacking in detail, and poorly
> composed.
> 
> The tree branches are useless, adding nothing to the photograph, and are
> intrusive, diminishing your clever idea. There's no detail in the tire (or
> whatever that blackish thing is) at the lower rightof this this old farm
> implement.  The blades of grass just run together rather than showing
> individual stalks, and the detail on the old machine is there but not
> clearly discernable.
> 
> What kind of film did you use?  Who processed it?  

Kodak HIE IR film processed at a "pro" lab. I tend to try and frame things with trees 
or
branches,but 
from the comments back so far i quess this was not the shot to do that in.
> 
> How many other shots did you take of this scene?  How do the others look? 
> I'd suggest redoing this one, or going back and shooting at least an entire
> roll or more from different angles, maybe at a different time of the day. 
> This looks like you saw something, jumped out of your car, walked over, and
> made a quick snap or two.

I took about a dozen of this implement and an old shed from various angles and focal
lengths.I was 
torn between this one and one from the wheel end.No branches,but a hydro line in the
background,but 
it did not say-old vs new- as much as i had hoped for.
I plan to go back and shoot it in traditional B&W film and see how they look.I agree 
about
the grass 
running together etc,but as Tom mentioned,this is characteristic of IR film and i quess
the wrong 
medium to use for what i wanted to do.
> 
> I wish I could be more positive about this one, Dave.

No problemShel. This is how i/we learn.

Dave
> 
> Shel 
> 
> 
> > [Original Message]
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 6/25/2004 12:20:59 PM
> > Subject: PAW:Relic in IR(does this make a statement)
> >
> >                                     
> >                     http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/relic-1.jpg
> 
> 

                                


Reply via email to