If the Sidekick is the same product as the Wilberley Tripod Head, two users
had the highest priase for it on a site about tripods, monopods, and heads:
Brian Bower: "I will never use a ballhead again for my telephoto work.
Because of the Wimberley$B!G(Bs radical design, true balance can be achieved. It
will never flop over on you and you can leave all adjustments loose so
panning along with your subject is effortless. After using the Wimberley
with my 600 f/4, I could never do without it."
Tom Peachey: "I was amazed at its incredibly smooth function. My Celestron
C-90 telescope acts exactly like its in a weightless environment. Rather
than be distracted by an annoying head, the Wimberley design is a joy to
use. It$B!G(Bs a family-run small business. You won$B!G(Bt be disappointed."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious if anybody has used the Wimberly Sidekick with a large
telephoto lens of about 300mm f/2.8 or larger. If you have, what did you
think of it?
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Wimberly Sidekick FstopTraveler
- Re: Wimberly Sidekick Paul . Stregevsky
- Re: Wimberly Sidekick P�l Jensen
- RE: Wimberly Sidekick McRae, Max MS
- RE: Wimberly Sidekick Jan van Wijk

