The squiggles, if they're an artifact of the scanning process, are something I get all the time, and it really pisses me off. If you figure out a way to get rid of it, lemme know!
I really like that image, though. What camera were they taken with?
cheers, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Double Exposure:paw Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:08:50 US/Eastern
Hi all.
Submitting a double exposure i did during last falls Lunar eclipse. The star swerls were
about 10 min on
bulb and the moon shot 125 at f 11.
Used the sp500 2x converter and the tak 200 f4.
There are some jaggies around the moon,but i hope thats not much of a distraction.
Scanned at a low dpi.
Dave http://www.caughtinmotion.com/PAW/double.jpg
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN Premium http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
