On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:34:03 +1030, you wrote: >Just to add another angle to the discussion; I found myself seriously >disappointed with the photoshop plugin. As far as I can see, the bayer >interpolation is based on dcraw's vng code, which is dodgey, at best. > >Having said that, Pentax's raw convertor is possibly worse, but compared to >Canon or Nikon's tools, the photoshop plugin (and dcraw) are dreadful >quality. It generates horrible edge aliasing and artifacting, not to >mention nasty colour interference in some cases. > >As always, this is just an opinion. YMMV. > >Love, Light and Peace, >- Peter Loveday >Director of Development, eyeon Software > > Thank you for the opinion, Peter. Do you have a comparison or two to show? I have a Nikon system in addition to Pentax so I may be able to generate a few myself later this week, but I probably don't have the expertise to know what to look for.
Do you know of any better tool than the plugin? -- John Mustarde www.photolin.com
