Rob I believe I caught them while they were doing the update! I just reloaded the page I pointed you to (the lens chart) and there isn't the 'o' in the Pentax column like there was before. I know what I saw the first time round because I followed the 80-400 OS row to the Pentax column to see an 'o' there. I triple-checked because it sounded like really big news when I saw it. I also remember the G (in the N** column) flanked by to 'o's on each side.
Also the 17-35 EX DG (77mm) link 10 minutes ago linked to a file on D:, and they seem to have fixed it since. Off the donkey, to the ground (with a Tanyaesque THUD) :-( Ryan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:45 AM Subject: RE: Sigma's version of IS is out? > Sorry to burst the bubble, but OS only works in previously IS bodies. I > think they said they were going to supply a NON-OS version in Pentax > mount later, but I don't see it listed on the second page you linked... > > Better keep asking that depressing question instead. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 09 February 2004 14:28 > > To: PDML > > Subject: Sigma's version of IS is out? > > > > > > Hey has anyone noticed this- > > http://sigmaphoto.com/Html/pages/80-400os.htm > > > > Sigma's version of IS.. compensates for horizontal and > > vertical shake in two modes. And in the lens chart here: > > http://sigmaphoto.com/Html/lenschart.htm > > they're making it > > for Pentax too! (we know they skipped us with their HSM) > > > > I don't really want to ask the depressing question 'do you > > think we'll see a Pentax IS?' or being up the > > semi-hallucinatory phrase 'IS Pentax body', but can't help > > thinking of it! > > > > Cheers, > > Ryan > > > > > > > >
