>From what I have seen so far, the learning curve is to find new and more > inventive ways to blame the bad results on the photo lab.
Or the camera... Jens -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 19. januar 2004 21:32 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: "Why digital cameras = better photographers" - BBC news Hi, William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mike wilson" > Subject: Re: "Why digital cameras = better photographers" - BBC news > > > Given the "most folks" scenario, I think it is more a case of "that" > > rather than "what" you did wrong. In many of those "most folks" cases > > they will not have the faintest clue _what_ they did wrong. Or, more > > properly, they will not have the faintest clue how to correct their > > perceived mistake. An advantage of digital is that they can then change > > settings, even at random, to see what happens and get an instant > > result. I wonder how many of them will actually undergo a learning > > experiance from it? > > >From what I have seen so far, the learning curve is to find new and more > inventive ways to blame the bad results on the photo lab. Hmmmm. We have a number of customers (students) whose smug, arrogant, witless, spawny-eyed, little mugs could usefully be smacked around to the other side of their heads. They are an insult to decerebrate turnips. m
