Juey Chong Ong wrote: > > On Saturday, August 9, 2003, at 04:06 AM, Alan Chan wrote: > > > I wonder if there is any reason not to produce ISO 100 or 50? > > Could it be that the data captured at ISO 50 or 100 is no better than > at ISO 200? > > --jc
Never thought of it that way. Could be... keith whaley
