althought i had an argument with keith, i do agree with him here: no one made any 
comments "at the kids expense", you might want to re-read the messages. this
kind of accusations is waaay overboard!

now *you* are trying to push the buttons. we have dropped the public dicussion here 
yesterday, so what exactly are you trying to accomplish now, bringing it up here again?

mishka

> From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: freedom-schmeedom
> 
> > Peter Alling wrote:
> > Look Keith, usually I'd be on you side.  In this 
> > case both of you and mishka are off the 
> > reservation. All you're doing is pushing each 
> > others buttons and not illuminating the
> > argument at all.  

> This is why I said we've taken it offline.
> If Miska wants to pursue the subject, right or 
> wrong, I'll happily do so, one on one.
> If it keeps all you from getting your butts in an 
> uproar over misunderstood verbal meanderings.
> This place is a real seething nest, isn't it. 
> Haven't figured out it's purpose yet, but I remain 
> properly wary...  <g>

> > Especially since it's at the expense of a kid 
> > who's been badly hurt doing what he believed in.  


Reply via email to