Now that you mention it, I think you're right, Nick. I wonder if anyone had two or more cameras, so that one always had a camera when the "used" one was sent back for processing and re-loading.
And, I wonder if you got back the same camera, or if they just sent back another one which was just sitting there full of fresh film, waiting to be shipped? -frank Nick Zentena wrote: > On June 23, 2003 09:55 pm, frank theriault wrote: > > That's cool! I love trivia - in fact, my whole life is a collection of > > trivial, unimportant events (but I digress...). > > > > I suppose that around the turn of the last century, the only cameras > > available to the general public (other than big, bulky, hard to use view > > cameras) were Eastman Kodaks. I'd never heard of Kodak being used as a > > verb, or as a synonym of photography, but it makes lots of sense. > > I guess in a way those cameras were the first disposable cameras. You sent > the whole thing in for processing and they sent back double prints and a > reloaded camera. I think they sent the camera back. > > Nick -- "What a senseless waste of human life" -The Customer in Monty Python's Cheese Shop sketch
