>> If you are consistent with that logic then a slide or transparency is not a >> photograph unless printed on silver halide photographic paper. > >And it's not. The process is photography, but the result is properly >called a slide and not a photograph. If you look at the Agfa contest >rules, you'll see they don't take slides either. And I didn't complain, >I'm not into the business of trying to pass slides as photographs.
I beg to differ. The process is photography, and the result is properly called a photograph. There are different ways of seeing this photograph. One is buy producing a slide, another is by producing a print. Wet print or inkjet. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________ Free UK Mac Ads www.macads.co.uk
