Re: Which macro lens would you buy

[Lon Williamson]

Steve, the request was for nature shots, bugs etc.
In my experience, edge-to-edge sharpness is often
not needed in such photography.  I'd be hard pressed,
on many of my shots, to show a difference
between macro lens shots and a short telephoto on
extension.
Steve Larson wrote:
True, it will get you the shot, but not edge to edge sharpness that a
true macro will generate.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: Which macro lens would you buy



I'd be tempted to buy extension tubes as a first step towards
macro.  Cheaper than a dedicated lens, and can often get you
the shot you want.
Steve Larson wrote:

Hi,
Vivitar Series 1 90-180/4.5 or Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 with 1:1

adapter,

coupled with an LX you have a great macro system.
Accessory #1) 58mm male to 58mm male filter ring.
Accessory #2) Vivitar Series 1 28/1.9 for reverse-mounting on 90/2.5
with 1:1 adapter for extreme close ups.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Cogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: Which macro lens would you buy




Hi
I want to quit using close-up filters and start using a macro lens for
flowers, insects, etc.  Which lens would be a good place to start?
Thanks,
Tony