> Somebody mentioned that it was a bit boring having lots > of shots of horses going over jumps
Well maybe not in those words! but yeah, that was me. I'll fess up. > well that's what the clients want to see! Yeah, I realized that after I sent the email. I either re-read his email or read a response and realized that his purpose is not to "Capture the event", but rather to make "cash money" from the riders seeing *their* photos. With that in mind, you're absolutely right, and his photos certainly serve their purpose. Along those lines, I also think that hisi idea of setting up a second website and/or gallery is a marvelous idea for people (like me) who you accurately described here: > It''s like my agility shots. Most people go through them - > "dog jumping", "dog jumping", "dog jumping", "dog jumping", > "dog jumping", "dog not jumping", "dog jumping", "dog jumping" etc. LOL... funny... but true. Like you said, the "sameyness of the shots" also stems from my lack of intimacy with the subject. > often there are only one or two good > vantage points and Dave doesn't want to be running around > like a blue a*sed fly blue assed fly? hmmmm... interesting. I'll have to keep my eye open for that one. Anyhow, I'm glad that at least the rest of my feedback proved helpful for you. And thanks, Wendy, for adding perspective.
