Yeah.  I should have said "spot or incident".

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/24/03 06:35PM >>>
Andrew,

See my earlier post on the subject.  I think you are confused somewhat
about
incident metering.  Both a reflected meter and an incident meter
measure
ambient light, the difference being that a reflective meter measures
light
reflected from a subject, and an incident meter measures the light
falling
on a subject.  Overall, usually, most of the time..... an incident
meter
will be more accurate, assuming that the light falling on the dome of
the
meter is in the same light as the subject.  IOW, you point a
reflective
meter at the subject, and an incident meter is placed near the subject
and
pointed towards the camera.

Hope this helps,

Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hagner, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 5:54 PM
Subject: RE: Hand Meters


> Steve:
>
> The light that is recorded on film is the reflected light from your
subject.
> The ambient meters measure only ambient light and ignores the
reflected
> light, so logically the reflected light meters give you information
that
you
> actually need.  Ambient meters, however work in many situations. 
When the
> contrast range is not exceeding the film contrast and when the same
type
of
> light hits your subject as it hits your meter then the ambient meters
are
> fine.  When you are photographing a distant scene in an interesting
light,
> it is likely that the light hitting your meter is very different from
the
> one that is falling on the scene.  In this case the ambient meter
gives
you
> no useful information.  If the scene exceeds the film contrast then
again,
> ambient meter gives you information relevant to the middle tones but
the
> highlight and shadows will be outside the films range.  In this case
the
> ambient meter gives you no information on the contrast range.
>
> So, my recommendation is to use a reflected spot meter which
overcomes
these
> shortcomings.  With little practice it is hard to make an error in
exposure
> provided the meter is linear and is properly calibrated.  My
favourite one
> is the Zone VI modified Pentax digital meter.  Very simple, reliable
and
> accurate.
>
> Cheers,  - Andrew.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: March 24, 2003 1:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: Hand Meters
>
>
> What would folks recommend in a handmeter, spot  or ambient?
>
>
> Steven Desjardins
> Department of Chemistry
> Washington and Lee University
> Lexington, VA 24450
> (540) 458-8873
> FAX: (540) 458-8878
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>
>


Reply via email to