Boz, in all sincerity, I hope you get what you want out of the new system.
To me that would mean more "keepers" and less in the circular file.
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bojidar Dimitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 5:45 PM
Subject: Good-bye Pentax (2)


> Hi all,
>
> thank you very much for the nice answers to my previous mail!  It is a
> really special feeling to know that I have done something worthwhile,
> and I am deeply moved that you all appreciate my work to such an
> extent.  I took no offense to the one or two mails that spoke about "the
> results count", "Canon is a gadget maker", don't worry.  I actually
> expected more resistance...  :-)
>
> What can I say?  It was not an easy decision, and I have been
> contemplating it for over a year now.  I have thought about it long and
> hard, and have had several (heated) discussions with PDML members Arnold
> Stark and Knut Kampe.  But in the end even Arnold's strongest and solid
> arguments could not overpower my will to move on.
>
> The real turn came when I recently decided that I want to try
> photographing birds and animals (nothing exotic, creatures in our garden
> or in the zoo).  The only lens that I was able to afford was a
> second-hand 400/5.6, and it had to be AF.  I have never seen a used FA*
> 400/5.6, so I look at eBay for a Canon.  Well, in the last 6 weeks there
> have been 8 of them for sale, and I got mine at a wonderful price.
> Adding a body and a flash was a breeze, so I was all set.  Let's say it
> like this:  My only Pentax experience with longer lenses was a day-trip
> with Arnold where I got to use his K 400/5.6 and M42->K 500/4.5.  Those
> photos were a disaster!  Manual aperture were manual focus too much for
> me!!!  Using the EOS 30 with the 400/5,6 USM is much more convenient.  I
> can dial in exp. comp. via the thumb dial in the back, flash exp. comp
> on the flash, AF is very fast, and can see well even through the small
> AF-type viewfinder.  Program shift is very convenient via the
> index-finger dial, and the eye-control AF "gimmick" work wonderfully for
> me!
>
> So, where are those that say that better technology does not lead to
> better photos?  Yes, each photo made with the greatest USM, IS, etc.
> lens can be made also without.  But the chances of doing that are almost
> non-existent!
>
> So, the main factors are:
>   - Canon has a more complete AF system
>   - Canon delivers new products and technologies faster
>   - it is far easier and more cost-effective to buy (second-hand) Canon
> gear (for example, I will soon be able to buy a like-new second-hand D60
> for about $800)
>   - one has certain security that one can never outgrow the Canon system
>   - counting from 1986 until now, Canon actually has better system
> compatibility than Pentax, and there is NO INDICATION that will have to
> change their mount any time soon  (Pentax is moving towards a mount
> change [at least simplification].  The *ist does NOT work properly with
> K and M lenses, and it is NOT an entry-level camera --- it has the best
> AF system of ANY Pentax camera!)
>
> Now, where is Pentax?  I feel that they have slowly but surely abandoned
> the market segment in which I am -- serious amateur.  If we ignore the
> brilliant FA* 200-600/5.6, they don't have much for sports or wild-life
> professionals either.  They seem to be concentrating in the segment of
> *ist and below.  I have nothing against that, but I wish Pentax would
> come out and say if my assumption is correct, or they are simply lacking
> the money/people/resources to develop things faster.
>
> In the end, it is all very simple.  I feel that very few serious
> amateurs and professionals use Pentax gear, and therefore the few
> serious Pentax items do not sell very well.  This then leads to Pentax
> not investing very much in development of such items, and more serious
> amateurs and professionals switch to other brands.  It's a vicious
> circle, and I am the real loser.
>
> So I switched...  But like I said, I'll keep an LX, FE-1, two bright
> screens, a 17/4 fish, A20/2.8, A24/2.8, K30/2.8, A50/1.7, and A100/2.8
> Macro.  Sad as it may be, soon after my current eBay auctions are over,
> I will also sell the superA, MZ-5n, battery pack Fg, M24-35/3.5 and FA
> 24-90/3.5-4.5.
>
> Once again, thanks for all your positive remarks and nice comments to my
> previous mail.
>
> Cheers,
> Boz
>
> --
>      _\\|//_     Imagination is more important than knowledge...
>    0(` O-O ')0                                           A. Einstein
> ===ooO=(_)=Ooo=======================================================
>  Bojidar D. Dimitrov      author and editor, Pentax K-Mount web page
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                        http://kmp.BDimitrov.de/
> =====================================================================
>    <__>   <__>
>
>

Reply via email to