At 08:27 PM 3/10/2003 +0300, you wrote:
I have no intent to argue the terminology and definitions of "fish", "eye" and "distortion", with either you or encyclopedia.
I asked the forum a question. Mind you, about a lens, patented by Pentax.
I explained what I meant, since it looked like my question was misinterpreted, supplying the link to the original article, quoting "0.2% mapping ditortion" -- by far better than anything else mentioned there. For those too lazy to read the article, I showed a couple of funny little formulae showing *exactly* what I meant.
If no one knows the answer -- fine. But I fail to see how either post (read: trolling) is relevant to the original question.
Mishka.
> > Fisheye lenses are defined as follows: > > "A fisheye lens produces extreme barrel distortion > > and exagerated forshortening in the center" by the > > ICP encyclopedia of Photography, your funny little > > formulaes not withstanding. > > > > William Robb > > We already knows he makes up his own rules, and > ignores those that are "stupid" to him. > > BR
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
