Pal wrote: > Arnold wrote: > >> So, if the *ist D will be >> considerably cheaper than its Nikon and Canon rivals, then I see no >> reason why the *ist D should not be successfull at a moment when the >> DSLR beomes a mass product.
> Whats makes you think it going to be cheaper? As far as I know the > Nikon D100 is due for replacement and Canon will make a DSLR based on the > Rebel. I'm sorry, but buy june the *ist D won't be the cheapest. > In addition, the new Canon D10 is reportedly selling for $1500, which > is similar to *ist D price estimates. However, Canon have the tradition > of dumping the prices of their DSLR after six months or so, perhaps as > early as the *ist D release date, perhaps sending it under $1000 mark. > I'm just trying to be realistic. > > P�l > P�l, so far the 1500$ figures are wishful thinking (perhaps after 2 years). What you are writing here seems to be totally out of the blue. I don't know what your point is here, honestly. Alexander real*ist __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
