I am a very probable. I REALLY want full frame, but I realise there are 'advantages' to the extra magnification. One day in the dim and distant, it would make a fine second body to my full frame, foveon, 20MP MZ-S derivative!
It all depends on price (just make sure its not totally out of order) and quality (Ideally better than D100). The 10D makes a SERIOUS case for going Canon, if the ist D does not undercut it on price and/or quality then I will have to think very carefully. If I had no glass I think I would be going 10D. Its largely because I don't want the hassle of changing glass (not even the expense - just the aggro) that I will probably buy *istD. Not because I am especially turned on by it, compared with the competition, or out of loyalty to Pentax or dislike of Canon. Canon are actually unbelievably good at the moment in the digital/lens/innovation/price market. > -----Original Message----- > From: zoomshot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 February 2003 16:21 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Hands up and be counted > > > > So, how many of you merry people are going to get an *ist-D > and if not why not? > > To start the ball rolling you can count me as a taker. > > Ziggy > > >
