Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >That's really twisting his meaning. How many 645 owners out there go >out of their way to purchase a 67 lens specifically to use on their >645? I gotta believe it is low. The only time I've heard of anyone >doing that is if they have both cameras.
Actually, I'm considering doing just that myself. I'm thinking of the 67 165mm f2.8 for my 645. (I've heard people say they don't like the 645 150/2.8, which is the closest 645 lens) -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
