On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, tom wrote: > Pro 67 > - big neg > - built like a big old manual focus camera of yore > - interchangeable finders
Mirror lock up. > Pro 645 > - af Only on the newer models. > - more shots per roll > - lighter as a system > - closer focusing (generally) > - takes film magazines > - takes Polaroid magazine (so does the 67, but you'd have to dedicate > a body to it, I think) > - data imprinting Only on the newer models. Pentax, and users, claime MLU not needed due to mirror brake. Less shutter vibration/mirror slap than 67 (no matter how overstated most people may claim this is, it definatly has some bearing). > - aspect ratio (67II is slightly squarer) I'm trying desperatly to remember what size my minilab proofs come back as, and I can't. All I know its not the 4x5 I expected from a "ideal format" camera, I think its 4x5.5... -- http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye. http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
