Smallness is one of the reasons for its success. Uncomplicated interface is another. The viewfinder is comparable to other cameras of its class but the display should be at the bottom - like the MZ-S has. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: David Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 31. tammikuuta 2003 21:32 Aihe: Re: 5n Bummer? >I tried one in a store near the end of 2001. I found it to >small,and did not like the viewfinder. >My $0.02 > >Dave >---- Begin Original Message ---- > >From: "Foto Syb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:21:49 +0100 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: 5n Bummer? > > > >Hey, what's that? someone calls the 5n a "bummer" and nobody (or >should i >say no body?) reacts? > >What's wrong with the 5N? What's your disappointment about? Oh come >on, >don't say it's that you were too attached to the manual modes, >should be >something else. > >Well? > > >My defense for the cam may be caused by lack of knowledge. Please >see this >mail as a request for information... :-) > >Thanks! >Syb >MZ-5Netherlands > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Chatten met je online vrienden via MSN Messenger. >http://messenger.msn.nl/ > > > >---- End Original Message ---- > > > > >Pentax User >Stouffville Ontario Canada >"Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art >stops and the wall begins"--Frank Zappa >http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ >http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses >Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail >
