I have never seen PZ-1 marketed as a pro camera. The MX most certainly was, with comparison pictures with Nikon F2. But how durable is the MX? All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: P�l Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 30. tammikuuta 2003 12:56 Aihe: Re: LX Questions >> The MX was marketed as a pro system also, and so was the PZ-1. > > > >There is a significant difference: the LX was specified for over 100 000 shutter >cycles and throughly tested under severe conditions. I read an interview with the >then Asahi boss, Minoru Suzuki, who explained in detail the philosophy behind the LX. >It was meant as an answer to the Nikon F2 and Canon F1. > >P�l >
