Hey Folks, I've been toying with the idea of adding a 35mm prime to the collection. While I liked the results from the 35/3.5, it's a lens I had a hard time getting to like. I think it was the dim viewfinder, especially when compared to the 50/1.7 I often use.
So, I'm considering getting one of the 35/2.8's. I seem to recall the A35/2.8 being poorly regarded. So I've been looking at the M35/2.8 but Boz's website indicates that they share the same optical formula. I don't seem to recall hearing anything negative about the M version and there are few reports on Stan's site. I tend to shoot at wider apertures so performance at f2.8, 3.5, and 4 are important to me. Is the M35/3.8 a good one? Or am I better off looking for a M or A 35/2.0? TIA, Mark __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
