Artur wrote: > Either I misunderstand the word "offense" (which is possible as I'm not an > English), or to be offended is to be hurt by a strictly personal charge or > insult. As I used neither of the two, not to mention that I never meant to > attack you, I'm deeply astonished that you reacted in such an emotional and > wrathful way. I've never meant to offend you in any way - if I did, I > apologize.
Huh? You said offended. I just replied with the same word. I'm not personally offended any way and you take this far too seriously. I just find your statement absurd based on two MZ-S bodies I've used extensively. >I do not deny that your both MZ-S' > release buttons may have halfway stops or maybe rather some rapid increase > of the resistance. I claim that I wasn't able to feel that increase... and a > couple of PDML-ers confirm that there is no *stop*. Actually, I see a clear > difference between the "stop", and the "increase of power". Well, on my camera if press with the force you normally use, the button has a clear stop. You need to use force to continue to release the shutter. My MZ-S does not have soft release all the way down but it doesn't have the type of release of the MZ-5n either, which is cheap and consist of a convex metal plate the buckles under pressure and pop back into shape. They are limited to low end bodies and have a limited lifespan due to material fatigue. > It's also pity that you reffered to but a small part of my previous mail. > There were more points in it... ...which I choose to ignore.
