Seth wrote: > I too think that a back that prints exposure info and is an > intervalometer to boot, is very useful. I don't get this. Why would anyone have this feature in an optional and expensive back. Why not implemented into the body like the MZ-S? Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org.
- A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax Bolo
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax SETH
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax PAUL STENQUIST
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax Bolo
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax SETH
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pent... P�l Jensen
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by ... Chris Brogden
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax P�l Jensen
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax Bolo
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax P�l Jensen
- RE: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax Jeff Tsai
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax Michel Adam
- RE: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax Jeff Tsai
- Re: A great body ... too bad it is not by Pentax P�l Jensen

