Hi all, I'm one of the authors of 7470.
I don't mind much about the outcome of this discussion, but the definition of "Updates" *still* remains occluded ☹ [1] 7322 no longer provides a definition, and the old definition in 2223 was, I think, confusing. IMHO, "B updates A" means that to achieve an implementation of A, one should also implement B. It does not mean "B builds on A" (else, pretty much any Internet protocol work would be an update to RFC 791. In the case of this draft, a new feature is being added to PCEP. In order to implement this document, you need to implement at least parts of 7470. But anyone implementing 7470 can just go ahead without any changes. Cheers, Adrian [1] Any IESG wishing to clarify this through a statement would be greatly helping the community and reducing the recurrence of this discussion. -----Original Message----- From: Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <[email protected]> Sent: 20 November 2024 10:38 To: Paul Wouters <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Pce] Re: Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-12: (with COMMENT) Hi Paul, There was already discussion whether update of RFC7470 should be done or not - there was not strong opinion against, but also no strong opinion for doing it, but it is finally probably better to do it. Attaching updated version. Please let me know if it is satisfying your comment. Thanks, Samuel -----Original Message----- From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 1:13 AM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-12: (with COMMENT) Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [RFC7470] defines the Enterprise Numbers allocated by IANA and managed through an IANA registry [RFC2578]. This document clarifies the Private Enterprise Numbers (PEN) as described in the IANA registry are same thing as Enterprise Numbers referred in this document and [RFC7470] Does this mean this document Updates: 7470 ? Because it currently does not. The use of "clarifies" versus "updates" here seems uhm convenient :) _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
