This is an important extension, and the content is well written, I support the adoption. Hope more people can work on it more critical when it becomes an WG draft.
Thanks, Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 9:23 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Hi Julien, I support the WG adoption of this work. It has been a long time since this work was started. It is an useful experiment. It would be good if the WG adopts it and progresses it further, especially helps with the IANA issues as Adrian pointed out. Thank you! Best Regards, Shuping -----Original Message----- From: Pce <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 12:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Hi all, We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense than an independent submission. As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case you're opposed. Thank you, Julien --- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
