>> - "untitled series #420" is certainly better than having every series >> named >> "untitled series", but I still think it's worse than "series starting >> with >> '[1/10] add foo to bar'" > > Should be trivial enough change. I wonder if we should save this into > the db on calculate it on the fly like I do for 'untitled series'? I'll > need to benchmark it and if the former is no slower, then this can be a > follow-up patch. If the latter is more performant, we'll need to respin.
So this is the only one I'm at all concerned about potentially needing a respin. You'd have to find the first patch in the series to work it out. I'm a bit nervous that would be expensive. Regards, Daniel >> I don't think all of this stuff would need to be included in the >> initial >> implementation, and I think one of us would be able to work on it. Are >> you >> aware of anything here that would be backwards incompatible that might >> need to >> go in now? The only thing I can think of would be the series naming. > > Yeah, I'm doing all of this in my spare time so it's going to be tough > to address all of the above in one giant series (hence breaking it up). > Personally, I'd like to see us review the series as-is right now, with a > focus on the models and parser, then start building upon it with > follow-up patches. Thoughts? > > Stephen > > [1] https://github.com/justquick/django-activity-stream _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
