Hi, I would suggest you sit down (virtually) and think about a proper roadmap for the, say, next five years. You need to decide what features must go, which need to be improved and what needs to be created. If this then still fits the needs of nqp/rakudo, that is awesome. But please don't say "we need to go the other way", when nobody really knows what that means.
I'd really love to see parrot evolve rather then stagnate, but I believe this stands and falls with a proper roadmap or vision. hth, FROGGS Am 25.06.2013 03:41, schrieb Allison Randal: > On 06/24/2013 04:34 PM, Darren Duncan wrote: >> >> So you're saying then that Jonathan's post wasn't an official statement >> from the Parrot dev team after the group decided what to do? It >> certainly read that way to me. > > Jonathan's statement on parrot-dev was the first I heard of it, and as > far as I know wasn't the result of any conversations with anyone. It > is his own personal opinion, which he's entitled to hold, but does not > reflect any official policy of the Parrot project. > > Allison _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
